7 Pitfalls of Simple Payback Period

SPP

There are many pitfalls of using Simple Payback Period (SPP) as a measure of a project’s merits. Ask yourself these seven questions: 

  1. Am I using the right figures? 
  • How did I calculate my costs?
  • How did I calculate my savings? 
  1. What about the time value of money? 
  1. What about the period after the payback? 
  1. Must the project’s SPP be less than or equal to the holding period for the property into which the measures are being installed? 
  1. Can SPP reflect cash flow probabilities? 
  1. Do SPP “rules of thumb” even make sense? 
  1. In Landlord/Tenant settings, whose SPP am I calculating? 

Just in case you are thinking, “Wait, but I use Return on Investment!” Return on investment (ROI) is the reciprocal of SPP and suffers from very similar shortcomings. SPP is the first cost divided by year one savings. ROI is year one savings divided by first cost.

EXAMPLE: 

  • $100,000 investment saves $25,000 in YR1
  • SPP = $100,000 divided by $25,000 = 4 years
  • ROI = $25,000 divided by $100,000 = 25%

Love one of our blogs? Feel free to use an excerpt on your own site, newsletter, blog, etc. Just be sure to send us a copy or link, and include the following at the end of the excerpt: “By Mark Jewell, Wall Street Journal best-selling author of Selling Energy: Inspiring Ideas That Get More Projects Approved! This content is excerpted from the Sales Ninja blog, Mark Jewell's daily blog on ideas and inspiration for advancing efficiency. Sign up at SellingEnergy.com.”

Want our daily content delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the Sales Ninja blog

Subscribe

By info@SellingEnergy.com (Mark Jewell, CEO of Selling Energy | www.SellingEnergy.com) | | financials |
next post → ← previous post